Cigarettes are legal. Zyn is the problem, says the World Health Organization. As it warns about nicotine pouches on World No Tobacco Day, Sweden offers a real-world lesson in tobacco harm reduction.
The "WHO" lost all credibility with me a long time ago, along with most of the other arms of the UN. Best to just consider the source, recognize it as rubbish and move on!
This shows that WHO is again not telling the truth about nicotine pouches. The WHO's statements are untrustworthy just like Carney is doing when it comes to what is best for Canadians. Cigarette smoke is disgusting so why not do away with it and let people use the nicotine pouches. Follow what Sweden is doing but this goes against what WHO is pushing, follow the money.
As an insurance professional, I see several clients who have transitioned away from cigarettes into nicotine pouches, and are happy about it. But because the insurance industry changes and evolves slowly, like a massive ship turning in a harbour, they are still regarded as smokers due to the nicotine traces in their urine sample. On the plus side, these people have broken the nasty habit of combustion addiction for something less damaging. In fact, a small cadre of health professionals promote nicotine (not smoking) for a variety of health benefits. I myself take an NMN supplement. I suppose it’s a developing market. But as to the WHO, absolute disregard for that criminal organization. The director’s personal history, the endorsement of Bill Clinton for leadership, and their actions during the blip are all decisive proof of the corruption of it as an organization. One only needs to research the roots of a tree to determine the poison of its branches and leaves.
From the title, I thought the article would discuss the health benefits of nicotine. Nicotine itself is not addictive; the cigarette companies made them addictive and they have done the same to the foods they sell. I'm not sure if they are doing the same to the pouches, but i expect they will.
"Nicotine acts as a powerful stimulant and sedative, triggering a rapid release of dopamine in the brain. This chemical reaction delivers a quick hit of pleasure, stress relief, and alertness. Because the brain quickly learns to crave these temporary rewards, the substance becomes highly addictive."
Nicotine is one of the most addictive substances that humans face. Cigarettes (a consumable that increases the risk of cancer and other terminal diseases) are a taxable revenue stream for governments. Marie Antionette said "let them eat cake" (apparently not ra real quote), Our government says "we will tax the narcotic consumable that increases health care costs".
Give us the short answer please? the AI overview is "Dr. Bryan Ardis is a chiropractor and popular health podcaster who promotes the controversial claim that nicotine is a therapeutic agent and nutrient that can help treat, reverse, or prevent chronic illnesses like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. However, these claims are not supported by mainstream clinical evidence and pose risks" Could AI be wrong? Having done hypnotherapy for selected folks who have an addiction to smoking in order for them to have a healthy lifestyle that does not include the expense of smoking (money and mental) nicotine is part of the addiction. so is anticipation, fear, and the comfort of success. All of those have to be addressed as triggers in addition to the neurochemical comfort that nicotine gives.
Thank you.... your opinion is appreciated... It is much better than being "Seldom right but never in doubt..." I am always willing to accept when i am wrong. It is part of learning.
Marie Antionette never said "let them eat cake"! The quote was propaganda (one of many lies) created by the anti-monarchists of the day & distributed in leaflet's across France!
What about the other side of the story? We are all born with bodies that can live to be 100 but what we do to them drastically reduces the number. As with all addictive drugs, what is nicotine doing to our bodies mentally, physically and emotionally? When a company like Benson and Hedges pays for someone's trip, alarms should be ringing.
Alcohol and cigarettes ,a Canadian government cash cow, are untouchable even if they contribute to millions in health care costs negating the revenue collected in tax dollars according to this article. The choice is yours Canadians. Just don’t let Carney set out the rules on what consists of a majority.
WHO, your Fauchi juice is causing cancer all over the place. The King, the princess, so many athletes, actors, celebrities. That unsafe and not working vaccine has long term killed hundred of thousands Canadians.
The "WHO" lost all credibility with me a long time ago, along with most of the other arms of the UN. Best to just consider the source, recognize it as rubbish and move on!
This shows that WHO is again not telling the truth about nicotine pouches. The WHO's statements are untrustworthy just like Carney is doing when it comes to what is best for Canadians. Cigarette smoke is disgusting so why not do away with it and let people use the nicotine pouches. Follow what Sweden is doing but this goes against what WHO is pushing, follow the money.
As an insurance professional, I see several clients who have transitioned away from cigarettes into nicotine pouches, and are happy about it. But because the insurance industry changes and evolves slowly, like a massive ship turning in a harbour, they are still regarded as smokers due to the nicotine traces in their urine sample. On the plus side, these people have broken the nasty habit of combustion addiction for something less damaging. In fact, a small cadre of health professionals promote nicotine (not smoking) for a variety of health benefits. I myself take an NMN supplement. I suppose it’s a developing market. But as to the WHO, absolute disregard for that criminal organization. The director’s personal history, the endorsement of Bill Clinton for leadership, and their actions during the blip are all decisive proof of the corruption of it as an organization. One only needs to research the roots of a tree to determine the poison of its branches and leaves.
From the title, I thought the article would discuss the health benefits of nicotine. Nicotine itself is not addictive; the cigarette companies made them addictive and they have done the same to the foods they sell. I'm not sure if they are doing the same to the pouches, but i expect they will.
Google AI says this about nicotine:
"Nicotine acts as a powerful stimulant and sedative, triggering a rapid release of dopamine in the brain. This chemical reaction delivers a quick hit of pleasure, stress relief, and alertness. Because the brain quickly learns to crave these temporary rewards, the substance becomes highly addictive."
Nicotine is one of the most addictive substances that humans face. Cigarettes (a consumable that increases the risk of cancer and other terminal diseases) are a taxable revenue stream for governments. Marie Antionette said "let them eat cake" (apparently not ra real quote), Our government says "we will tax the narcotic consumable that increases health care costs".
Its not the nicotine which is addictive believe it or not ,,, Please see Dr Brian Artis who has pioneered research on nicotine
Give us the short answer please? the AI overview is "Dr. Bryan Ardis is a chiropractor and popular health podcaster who promotes the controversial claim that nicotine is a therapeutic agent and nutrient that can help treat, reverse, or prevent chronic illnesses like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. However, these claims are not supported by mainstream clinical evidence and pose risks" Could AI be wrong? Having done hypnotherapy for selected folks who have an addiction to smoking in order for them to have a healthy lifestyle that does not include the expense of smoking (money and mental) nicotine is part of the addiction. so is anticipation, fear, and the comfort of success. All of those have to be addressed as triggers in addition to the neurochemical comfort that nicotine gives.
Fair enough ,,, but is it possible that "mainstream clini cal evidence" is wrong?
with the name "Seldom wrong" I can only assume you are a narcissist...I said politely...
Thank you.... your opinion is appreciated... It is much better than being "Seldom right but never in doubt..." I am always willing to accept when i am wrong. It is part of learning.
touche...lol
Marie Antionette never said "let them eat cake"! The quote was propaganda (one of many lies) created by the anti-monarchists of the day & distributed in leaflet's across France!
Thank your for laying a Faux Quote to rest.... - pardon the cryptic pun.
What about the other side of the story? We are all born with bodies that can live to be 100 but what we do to them drastically reduces the number. As with all addictive drugs, what is nicotine doing to our bodies mentally, physically and emotionally? When a company like Benson and Hedges pays for someone's trip, alarms should be ringing.
I long for the days when the WHO was just an awesome band.
Alcohol and cigarettes ,a Canadian government cash cow, are untouchable even if they contribute to millions in health care costs negating the revenue collected in tax dollars according to this article. The choice is yours Canadians. Just don’t let Carney set out the rules on what consists of a majority.
Follow the money? Cigarettes are big business in Canada. Also, the leftists actually would prefer us Canadians just smoke ourselves into the ground.😡
WHO, your Fauchi juice is causing cancer all over the place. The King, the princess, so many athletes, actors, celebrities. That unsafe and not working vaccine has long term killed hundred of thousands Canadians.