Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Murrius's avatar

The Smith government and the Alberta teachers union had a negotiated agreement which the teachers then rejected, demanding even more money. However, at the core of the teacher's rejection of what their own union saw as a decent agreement is their utter antipathy towards the UPC government and itself and its politics. They detest the limits the Smith government put on the grooming of children with trans propaganda in the classroom. They hate that they now have to inform parents if a child, at their insistence, begins "transitioning" to the opposite gender. They also completely hate that they were ordered to remove what amounted to child pornography from elementary school libraries. They fear alternative schooling for children such as occurs in private schools, home schooling, and Alberta charter schools and have argued for their abolition. These place children out of their power to indoctrinate in leftist ideology. This is what drives their rejection of any settlement as their ultimate goal is to damage the Smith government and, if possible, bring it down.

Expand full comment
Bryan Dale's avatar

The notwithstanding clause is needed because the Supreme Court has recognized a charter right to collective bargaining and a right to strike. It’s interesting that the federal government is trying to change the constitution by judicial fiat to restrict use of the notwithstanding clause, yet over the past year or so, they have ordered several federal sector unions back to work with nothing more than a minister’s order, sweeping away the constitution like yesterday’s trash.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts