Juno News

Juno News

Supreme Court upholds Trudeau-era gag on MPs

The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld a law preventing MPs from speaking about confidential intelligence reports.

Clayton DeMaine
May 01, 2026
∙ Paid
Source Lakeheadu.ca and Wikipedia Commons

Law professor Ryan Alford’s challenge of the NSICOP Act, a Trudeau-era law which prevents MPs from speaking about the findings of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians reports in the House of Commons, has been upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada.

The law threatens jail time for anyone who accesses the reports and reveals their contents, even in the House of Commons, which has historically afforded parliamentary privilege, shielding MPs from legal ramifications for speech uttered in Parliament. Alford attempted to argue that the law was unconstitutional as it restricts the free expression of parliamentarians who view the reports.

The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the law in an 8-1 vote, stating that Section 18 of the Constitution Act means that laws cannot be made that “fundamentally undermine” parliament’s function as a Westminster-style parliamentary democracy modelled on the English parliament.

Freedom of expression is under attack in Canada. If you value free speech and accountability, help us grow this movement. Become a Juno News premium subscriber today.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Candice Malcolm.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Candice Malcolm · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture