Juno News

Juno News

Smith, Moe reject weaponizing oil, potash in U.S. trade war

Saskatchewan and Alberta’s premiers vehemently oppose export tariffs on oil and potash, warning it would badly backfire.

Alex Dhaliwal
Aug 28, 2026
∙ Paid
Source: X (Mark Carney)

Two Western premiers are drawing a red line against weaponizing Canada’s natural resources, warning export levies against the U.S. could blow back spectacularly at home.

An export tariff, or a tax on goods and resources leaving a country, is typically paid by the exporter.

Though relatively rare, governments can use them to raise revenue, preserve domestic supply or encourage more processing at home before products are exported.

X avatar for @junonewscom
Juno News@junonewscom
"We cannot and will not support" export tariffs on Canadian natural resources. Sask. Premier Scott Moe rejected using potash as a weapon against the U.S., warning it would kill Canadian jobs, raise costs for farmers and drive American buyers to countries like Belarus.
8:58 PM · Aug 26, 2026 · 33.8K Views

95 Replies · 552 Reposts · 2.61K Likes

But for Premiers Scott Moe and Danielle Smith, the former does not sound enticing.

“We as a province cannot and will not support any kind of export tariff on our natural resources,” Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe said Wednesday.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith followed suit, calling export levies “a disastrous policy decision.”

“Doing so would absolutely devastate the Canadian economy,” she adds.

We need your support to continue producing hard-hitting news and opinion, just like this. Become a Juno News premium subscriber today to support independent media.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Candice Malcolm.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Candice Malcolm · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture