"His CHRC complaint also says he believes his dismissal was tied to an X post he made about then-CBC president Catherine Tait declining to be interviewed on Canada Tonight, which he called “unfortunate.”
Dhanraj also alleges CBC anchors Rosemary Barton and David Cochrane "harassed and bullied" him, which CBC management enabled."
Tait/ Barton/ Cochrane...3 names mentioned often when "dessension/ toxic/ biased/ and controlling were the topic in discussion..Tait is just Chrystia Freeland in a Red fluorescent wig..and Barton/ Cochrane I find, are a funnier couple than Laurel and Hardy..(yup...I'm old!!)
Back in around 2012, the CBC decided as a corporation that the science around climate change was settled - climate change was real and was anthropogenic - Climate Scientist MP Justin Trudeau told them so - and from that point made it corporate policy that they would no longer interview anyone with a contrary view. But at the same time informed us that they were an unbiased, fact based news organization. I have virtually watched no CBC since then.
As I wrote, I haven't watched the CBC since 2012 (apparently, I'm not alone). Not even reruns of the Beachcombers. Instead, I went to Tofino, BC, two weeks ago and relived the Beachcombers...
Kudos to Travis for having the ethics and strength to publicly challenge this gross mismanagement by the CBC's leadership. I wish him every success in exposing what many Canadians already take as a given, and hope that any compensation awarded to him is taken into account when paying any further bonuses paid to the likes of David Cochrane, Rosemary Barton, and Catherine Tait - all authors of the declining viewership and lack of public interest in this worthless excuse for journalism.
I wish Travis all the luck in the world with the CHRC. I know from experience they look for avenues to dismiss claims, my experience was that they would not support my human rights complaint over my company forcing me to accept non medical devices and injections in or onto my person and was disciplined for this without pay.
So if the CHRC can't even uphold my most basic of human rights as to bodily autonomy and discrimination because of it they will try to flush you faster than "shit off a shingle."
CBC is a corrupt organization & I believe every word this man tells us about this horrible media supported by taxpayer funds by a government who dictates what is said. Why anyone would watch this disgusting media is puzzling. To say that they're "unbiased" is laughable. Apparently, they don't think it's obvious & that Canadians are too stupid to realize what they're doing. Barton SHOULD BE FIRED as she's no journalist; she's a propagandist on behest of the government who pays her salary from taxpayer funds. Revolting!!
I sincerely hope that Travis Danraj is successful when his complaint is reviewed. This whole affair just screams for the CBC to be defunded completely. Bias does not even cut what the CBC is doing and actually getting away with. Best to you in this fight, Travis Danraj, your courage is amazing!
This complaint says more about Travis Dhanraj than it does the CBC.
He claims the CBC set out to demoralize him. If CBC is a shit hole, which it is, anyone with morals would have quit long before they were ever “forced to resign.” He claims the CBC caused him "psychological harm"; he clearly has skin as thin as tissue paper. Rather than parting ways with this vile corporation, Travis Dhanraj demands diversity, equity, and inclusion. (DEI)
Nonstop exploitation of CBC to gain your ratings; nice job JUNO. Have you offered Travis Dhanraj a job? Whose side are you on?
So, Harold...you've never been stuck in a shitty (toxic) job and had to try sticking it out to make the best of it because being the breadwinner with family/ bills etc. you couldn't just up and quit like in our teen years?..AND getting shit on for doing the job your schooling and training taught you to do??...THEN accuse Juno of exploiting the CBC..a corporation that has used their position to undermine us..and our country?!..Harold, I usually find your input here helpful and informative, but you are offside on this one.
Whenever I have gone to a job interview, I am interviewing them, not the other way around. During the interview I have stood up on occasion and said no thanks, and walked out. I dont work FOR people, I work WITH people, and when that can't be done, I get the fuck out. I have never been fired. So no, I can't say that I have ever worked for shitty corporations; everywhere I have worked I have recieved promotions. 20 years ago, I went out on my own and bought a corporation and I have been running it ever since.
As once an employee and now a employer, I call things as I see them, from a employee's perspective and a employers perspective.
CBC is a shit-hole and everybody knows that. How many examples of how shitty CBC is do we need? 20 more? 50 more? JUNO is using the CBC as a demonstration of what JUNO is not; exploitation is the use of something or someone for your own advantage.
Well..ok..Juno has never made it a secret of wanting to rout the CBC..while still focusing on the many other issues..freedoms/ rights/ corruption/ bias/ the WEF, UN, CCP Regime/...and they have done..and ARE doing that. However, during "The Election", Carney (thru the CBC)..upped their attack on Indie media..especially focusing on Candice and Juno News..To put in terms of an assault..THEY threw the first punch..and as it's the unspoken rule in a fight..if you're still standing after getting the first punch..you come back HARD. That is what Juno has done..and still doing..kicking the living shit outta the corporation that is the biggest cause of this cesspool which was CANADA ...and you..or ANYONE opposing that on here is offside
Since 1979, I have made it clear that I want CBC abolished.
The Background:
To complete with the USA, the CBC was created for the sole purpose of introducing Canadian talent: that was it's origional mandate. Once they got into the News business, contrary to to their mandate, they became a propaganda machine for both the federal government and the major Corporations, such as Big Pharma; Bayer, Pfyser, et all. You cannot go against Big Pharma when you are recieving Big Pharma money, and you cannot go against the Feds when you recieving money from the feds.
Back to the topic at hand; this case that we are focused upon is no where associated with the other issues that you have brought in.
An employee of the CBC has filed a complaint. Is the complaint a conviction? Why is JUNO NEWS treating it as such??? A CONVICTION is news worthy - a complaint is not. What if the CBC is cleared of any wrong doing? Then what will you say? You will say the hearing was rigged. This is what happens to the minds of people when the News Media jumps the gun. You are innocent until proven guilty. Has the CBC been proven guilty?
So, contrary to what you believe, I am not off-side. I am a JUNO subscriber, and when without a judicial hearing, JUNO tries to convict someone in the minds of their viewing audience, I have a big problem with that.
CBC's Annual budget is $1.4 Billion, and it is watched by Just three-percent of the Canadian population. Full stop. Let that sink in. Bullshit aside, just by numbers alone, CBC is a failed corporation and should have been liquidated long ago.
If CBC had kept it's original mandate, "Canada's got talent" would be competing with "America's got talent."
This complaint does say more about Travis than it does about the CBC. It says that he's the one with the ethics and guts to challenge and publicly expose what he believes to be unethical human resource practices employed by their managers. This is an important test because how they manage their staff is a strong indication of their true value and credibility as journalists entrusted with public funding to ensure that we receive the highest achievable standard of broadcasting and the equitable portrayal of people involved in their programming. We have a right to know whether high salaries and bonuses are being earned in exchange for unwavering allegiance to a biased and misleading agenda. If this is true, then the managers involved are empowered by puppets who quietly acquiesce to their biased and misleading agendas rather than resist their bullying and threats to cease and desist or be fired. It takes more people like Travis and fewer lily-livered quitters to ensure that victims of toxic work environments, rather than incompetent managers, are the ones who survive.
Well said!!..and it looks like the only fireworks opening Parliament today was inside..Carney and Poilievre exchanging words..but remains to be seen what Carney has up his sleeve..he only needs 3 votes from any of the opposition to push thru legislation..and the NDP are pretty much his farm team..(still dunno how they managed a seat in Parliament!!...some backdoor deals were made,,)
The Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) is not a court of law but an independent agency responsible for administering the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA). Its primary role is to investigate complaints of discrimination and harassment based on prohibited grounds, such as race, sex, disability, and age, in areas under federal jurisdiction: e.g., employment, housing, services provided by federally regulated entities.
The CHRC's process involves:
1. Receiving and screening complaints to determine whether they fall under federal jurisdiction and allege a violation of the CHRA.
2. Conducting investigations into complaints that meet these criteria.
3. Attempting to resolve complaints through mediation or settlement.
4. If a complaint cannot be resolved, referring it to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) for a hearing.
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is where the actual adjudication of human rights complaints takes place. The CHRT is a quasi-judicial body that conducts hearings to determine whether discrimination has occurred. It has the power to order remedies, including monetary compensation, reinstatement, and changes to policies or practices.
While the CHRC and CHRT work together to enforce the CHRA, they serve distinct roles. The CHRC investigates and prepares cases, while the CHRT adjudicates them. This two-step process allows for both an investigative phase (CHRC) and an adjudicative phase (CHRT), ensuring that complaints are thoroughly examined before any legal determinations are made.
The CHRC is designed to be accessible to all individuals, regardless of their financial situation or legal background. The process is intended to be user-friendly, with resources available to guide complainants through each step.
The complaintant must:
- Keep detailed records of the alleged discrimination, including dates, times, locations, and the actions or words of the respondent.
- Organize any supporting evidence, such as emails, witness statements, or medical records.
Moreover, a complaint is not a conviction. Let's keep that in mind.
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is best discribed as a kangaroo Court. In the most part, it was constructed to give retards rule over the sane. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is the long arm of the UNITED NATIONS. (UN)
Behind the warm and fuzzy Titles such as "Human Rights" are those whose interests are to distroy Canada's culture, morals, and principles.
For clarity, if you were satan, wouldn't you hide behind the title - "The Church of God"?
How ironic. Using their woke BS against them.
This is obviously the tip of a very large iceberg. He’ll fit in nicely with several independent media outlets.
In the meantime, i wish him every success in his fight against the CBC. Of course, they’ll use OUR taxpayer dollars to fund their defence…😡
Can't have dissention in a Communist work place.
Exactly!
"His CHRC complaint also says he believes his dismissal was tied to an X post he made about then-CBC president Catherine Tait declining to be interviewed on Canada Tonight, which he called “unfortunate.”
Dhanraj also alleges CBC anchors Rosemary Barton and David Cochrane "harassed and bullied" him, which CBC management enabled."
Tait/ Barton/ Cochrane...3 names mentioned often when "dessension/ toxic/ biased/ and controlling were the topic in discussion..Tait is just Chrystia Freeland in a Red fluorescent wig..and Barton/ Cochrane I find, are a funnier couple than Laurel and Hardy..(yup...I'm old!!)
Back in around 2012, the CBC decided as a corporation that the science around climate change was settled - climate change was real and was anthropogenic - Climate Scientist MP Justin Trudeau told them so - and from that point made it corporate policy that they would no longer interview anyone with a contrary view. But at the same time informed us that they were an unbiased, fact based news organization. I have virtually watched no CBC since then.
I haven’t watched the CBC for 10-15 years now. They are completely off balance and bow to the DEI gods.
Not even Beachcomber reruns???🤣
Not even that..
🤣
As I wrote, I haven't watched the CBC since 2012 (apparently, I'm not alone). Not even reruns of the Beachcombers. Instead, I went to Tofino, BC, two weeks ago and relived the Beachcombers...
👍🤣
Kudos to Travis for having the ethics and strength to publicly challenge this gross mismanagement by the CBC's leadership. I wish him every success in exposing what many Canadians already take as a given, and hope that any compensation awarded to him is taken into account when paying any further bonuses paid to the likes of David Cochrane, Rosemary Barton, and Catherine Tait - all authors of the declining viewership and lack of public interest in this worthless excuse for journalism.
Awesome
I wish Travis all the luck in the world with the CHRC. I know from experience they look for avenues to dismiss claims, my experience was that they would not support my human rights complaint over my company forcing me to accept non medical devices and injections in or onto my person and was disciplined for this without pay.
So if the CHRC can't even uphold my most basic of human rights as to bodily autonomy and discrimination because of it they will try to flush you faster than "shit off a shingle."
Good luck Travis
Tell us what we already know. The CBC is a steaming pile of woke garbage.
That is great but the Canadian Human Rights Commission is a left leaning organization so I don't hold out any hope for him sadly!
CBC is a corrupt organization & I believe every word this man tells us about this horrible media supported by taxpayer funds by a government who dictates what is said. Why anyone would watch this disgusting media is puzzling. To say that they're "unbiased" is laughable. Apparently, they don't think it's obvious & that Canadians are too stupid to realize what they're doing. Barton SHOULD BE FIRED as she's no journalist; she's a propagandist on behest of the government who pays her salary from taxpayer funds. Revolting!!
I sincerely hope that Travis Danraj is successful when his complaint is reviewed. This whole affair just screams for the CBC to be defunded completely. Bias does not even cut what the CBC is doing and actually getting away with. Best to you in this fight, Travis Danraj, your courage is amazing!
Pravda Canada. Defund, sell off assets , fire, without pensions everyone there.
This complaint says more about Travis Dhanraj than it does the CBC.
He claims the CBC set out to demoralize him. If CBC is a shit hole, which it is, anyone with morals would have quit long before they were ever “forced to resign.” He claims the CBC caused him "psychological harm"; he clearly has skin as thin as tissue paper. Rather than parting ways with this vile corporation, Travis Dhanraj demands diversity, equity, and inclusion. (DEI)
Nonstop exploitation of CBC to gain your ratings; nice job JUNO. Have you offered Travis Dhanraj a job? Whose side are you on?
So, Harold...you've never been stuck in a shitty (toxic) job and had to try sticking it out to make the best of it because being the breadwinner with family/ bills etc. you couldn't just up and quit like in our teen years?..AND getting shit on for doing the job your schooling and training taught you to do??...THEN accuse Juno of exploiting the CBC..a corporation that has used their position to undermine us..and our country?!..Harold, I usually find your input here helpful and informative, but you are offside on this one.
Whenever I have gone to a job interview, I am interviewing them, not the other way around. During the interview I have stood up on occasion and said no thanks, and walked out. I dont work FOR people, I work WITH people, and when that can't be done, I get the fuck out. I have never been fired. So no, I can't say that I have ever worked for shitty corporations; everywhere I have worked I have recieved promotions. 20 years ago, I went out on my own and bought a corporation and I have been running it ever since.
As once an employee and now a employer, I call things as I see them, from a employee's perspective and a employers perspective.
CBC is a shit-hole and everybody knows that. How many examples of how shitty CBC is do we need? 20 more? 50 more? JUNO is using the CBC as a demonstration of what JUNO is not; exploitation is the use of something or someone for your own advantage.
Well..ok..Juno has never made it a secret of wanting to rout the CBC..while still focusing on the many other issues..freedoms/ rights/ corruption/ bias/ the WEF, UN, CCP Regime/...and they have done..and ARE doing that. However, during "The Election", Carney (thru the CBC)..upped their attack on Indie media..especially focusing on Candice and Juno News..To put in terms of an assault..THEY threw the first punch..and as it's the unspoken rule in a fight..if you're still standing after getting the first punch..you come back HARD. That is what Juno has done..and still doing..kicking the living shit outta the corporation that is the biggest cause of this cesspool which was CANADA ...and you..or ANYONE opposing that on here is offside
Since 1979, I have made it clear that I want CBC abolished.
The Background:
To complete with the USA, the CBC was created for the sole purpose of introducing Canadian talent: that was it's origional mandate. Once they got into the News business, contrary to to their mandate, they became a propaganda machine for both the federal government and the major Corporations, such as Big Pharma; Bayer, Pfyser, et all. You cannot go against Big Pharma when you are recieving Big Pharma money, and you cannot go against the Feds when you recieving money from the feds.
Back to the topic at hand; this case that we are focused upon is no where associated with the other issues that you have brought in.
An employee of the CBC has filed a complaint. Is the complaint a conviction? Why is JUNO NEWS treating it as such??? A CONVICTION is news worthy - a complaint is not. What if the CBC is cleared of any wrong doing? Then what will you say? You will say the hearing was rigged. This is what happens to the minds of people when the News Media jumps the gun. You are innocent until proven guilty. Has the CBC been proven guilty?
So, contrary to what you believe, I am not off-side. I am a JUNO subscriber, and when without a judicial hearing, JUNO tries to convict someone in the minds of their viewing audience, I have a big problem with that.
CBC's Annual budget is $1.4 Billion, and it is watched by Just three-percent of the Canadian population. Full stop. Let that sink in. Bullshit aside, just by numbers alone, CBC is a failed corporation and should have been liquidated long ago.
If CBC had kept it's original mandate, "Canada's got talent" would be competing with "America's got talent."
This complaint does say more about Travis than it does about the CBC. It says that he's the one with the ethics and guts to challenge and publicly expose what he believes to be unethical human resource practices employed by their managers. This is an important test because how they manage their staff is a strong indication of their true value and credibility as journalists entrusted with public funding to ensure that we receive the highest achievable standard of broadcasting and the equitable portrayal of people involved in their programming. We have a right to know whether high salaries and bonuses are being earned in exchange for unwavering allegiance to a biased and misleading agenda. If this is true, then the managers involved are empowered by puppets who quietly acquiesce to their biased and misleading agendas rather than resist their bullying and threats to cease and desist or be fired. It takes more people like Travis and fewer lily-livered quitters to ensure that victims of toxic work environments, rather than incompetent managers, are the ones who survive.
Well said!!..and it looks like the only fireworks opening Parliament today was inside..Carney and Poilievre exchanging words..but remains to be seen what Carney has up his sleeve..he only needs 3 votes from any of the opposition to push thru legislation..and the NDP are pretty much his farm team..(still dunno how they managed a seat in Parliament!!...some backdoor deals were made,,)
Not to worry , the lawyers will fill their pockets. Isn't this about that ?
With TAXPAYER a money, that is…
That depends upon whether he hires a Lawyer or not. For human rights complaints, a lawyer is not needed.
Well My guess is He has had lawyers instructing Him. We shall see as this "case" goes forward.
The Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) is not a court of law but an independent agency responsible for administering the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA). Its primary role is to investigate complaints of discrimination and harassment based on prohibited grounds, such as race, sex, disability, and age, in areas under federal jurisdiction: e.g., employment, housing, services provided by federally regulated entities.
The CHRC's process involves:
1. Receiving and screening complaints to determine whether they fall under federal jurisdiction and allege a violation of the CHRA.
2. Conducting investigations into complaints that meet these criteria.
3. Attempting to resolve complaints through mediation or settlement.
4. If a complaint cannot be resolved, referring it to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) for a hearing.
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is where the actual adjudication of human rights complaints takes place. The CHRT is a quasi-judicial body that conducts hearings to determine whether discrimination has occurred. It has the power to order remedies, including monetary compensation, reinstatement, and changes to policies or practices.
While the CHRC and CHRT work together to enforce the CHRA, they serve distinct roles. The CHRC investigates and prepares cases, while the CHRT adjudicates them. This two-step process allows for both an investigative phase (CHRC) and an adjudicative phase (CHRT), ensuring that complaints are thoroughly examined before any legal determinations are made.
The CHRC is designed to be accessible to all individuals, regardless of their financial situation or legal background. The process is intended to be user-friendly, with resources available to guide complainants through each step.
The complaintant must:
- Keep detailed records of the alleged discrimination, including dates, times, locations, and the actions or words of the respondent.
- Organize any supporting evidence, such as emails, witness statements, or medical records.
Moreover, a complaint is not a conviction. Let's keep that in mind.
Thanks for the lesson . It appears to me that here is another "justice" system in Canada . Am I wrong in My assessment?
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is best discribed as a kangaroo Court. In the most part, it was constructed to give retards rule over the sane. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is the long arm of the UNITED NATIONS. (UN)
Behind the warm and fuzzy Titles such as "Human Rights" are those whose interests are to distroy Canada's culture, morals, and principles.
For clarity, if you were satan, wouldn't you hide behind the title - "The Church of God"?
oh ya..it's a 2 tier system..right in front of us in brown and white
Thanks HAROLD!
Not being there I will only say 99% probability of being factual!
Took a stats course back in 1970’s at U of M so leaning on my education and experience!