9 Comments
User's avatar
Albertian's avatar

“Fining people thousands of dollars for no-risk activities like hiking or birdwatching is not a rational way to manage wildfire concerns. " It is a real way to lock down and restrict people which is the real goal, not unlike the plandemic.

Expand full comment
Franz Kafka's avatar

This should be interesting. Will the corrupt, supine and entitled judiciary dare to find their balls?

And will it be too little too late? An immediate injunction is now already justice delayed, and therefore denied. What is worse is that A C (After COVID) the state feels it can get away with anything, from lawfare, to seizing bank accounts, to stifling free speech and burning churches.

How can Bolsheviks be stopped? Perhaps history holds an answer. Significantly, once tipping point had been reached, it took Russia and China 80 years of GULAG Hell to overcome them. And that was accompanied by several miracles.

I do not see miracles ahead for the Governorate of Canada.

Expand full comment
Robyn Grater's avatar

On Friday I read an article from a different Canadian independent news source, and they offered another reason why Nova Scotia gov't wants to keep people out of the Woods. And that is bc they apparently sprayed all their woods with the deadly glyphosate (which should be banned if it is not already, for being so poisonous and hazardous to human health). I can't verify this but it does add a new 'spin' as to why they REALLY don't want you in the woods, and why they don't want anyone going in and investigating what they are actually doing! What a mess!

Expand full comment
russell's avatar

Double confounding is that the use of this spray actually kills broadleaf plants, which retain water in its branches, leaves and roots, and creates a form of firebreak. The dead trees and bushes then dry out and turn it into tinder, just what fires love. Glyphosate or "Round Up" by another name, is also a carcinogen. Quite deadly depending on the amount of absorption. I'm not from Nova Scotia, and I'm glad I'm not.

Expand full comment
Ruth Bard's avatar

“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”

― C. S. Lewis

Expand full comment
Tom C.'s avatar

Not sure if you've heard but CS Lewis is now a far right Christian against the good of man kind according to the main stream media in England.

Expand full comment
Jerrold Lundgard's avatar

The public has always had unlimited right of access to crown land. This is a common law right.

Activity on crown land can be regulated but access can not be denied by the crown Nor can a government suspend an inherent and immutable right.

Expand full comment
Don Hrehirchek's avatar

I agree . Take the government to the legal system and show the people that their rights are taken away. If This is not won on the legal battle , it may turn to the illegal battle. We as people can only stand so much freedom taken away from us!

Expand full comment
John Bradley's avatar

The idiocy of all our leaders continues. When will Canadians wake up! Too late I bet.

Expand full comment