We'll take it!!..and start REALLY putting the pressure on!! There are some stubborn "Liberals" that REFUSE to see that their party is nothing but a front for the WEF/ UN agenda 21 Regime, but SOME are starting to put things together..and when we inform them of Justin's 2015 chat with the NY Times "Canada is the first post national state" that seemed to snap them awake!! I know it doesn't sound like much..but if it gets the ball rolling, it'll gain momentum (hmm..think that's why The WEF Front called the election for the earliest possible date??..Pretty sure they underestimated Poilievre's rallies and the massive turnouts that are turning the tide..LET'S KEEP IT UP..
Carneys problems go beyond WEF rhetoric. His platform is premisednon hope not rational action. First he smells corrupt. Second how will he balance budget, cutting taxes and spending massive on infrastructure. Third, his housing plan will not deliver affordable for purchase homes. And not likely to build rentals/subsidised homes at 500,000 a year. Fourth, he lies, like Justin in 2015. Do you now know why Justin lied about ending first past the post, cause in the two elections the CPC got more popular votes than LOC. Our democracy has warts.
The conservatives, in my opinion, should be somewhere around 75%+. As it is quite obvious that con carney and the lieberals plan is to completely distroy this country. As we've been witnessing for the last decade. More evidence is in con carney getting loans from china not canada, to the tune of a quarter billion dollars. Then, moving all his money to burmuda. And moving his company to the US. Why would a person who believes in the country that he wants to rule in do this. Only some one who has dirty ultimate plans would do such a thing. To me that's a traitor. AND this doesn't take in that they have been pilfering from the taxpayers piggy bank.
So true!!..and he probably used Canada as collateral for his Chinese loan!!..bastard!! It's beyond my comprehension how the WEF Liberals have supporters..must be all the "Temp" foreign workers/ Illegal / unchecked immigrants (the bad ones), and their CCP buddies...Well the only way to beat them is to have at least 80% voter turnout for the Conservatives Apr 28..and we're gonna cast the early vote cuz hopefully election night will be swamped
The three scandals this article mentions are just the tip of the iceberg, and if one digs deeper, they would find that Con Carney should be classed as a traitor, with the new name, Convicted Traitor Carney!
I'm wanting to confirm something on Facebook today..2 guys on their cell talking about hundreds of South Americans (almost all male ) arriving at Pearson today and being shuttled thru to waiting busses..not trying to stir things up but did anyone else see anything at Pearson??
To add to your concerns, I feel mass immigration is ruining our country. Yesterday, a female podcaster from Israel noted that the majority of refugees that came to Europe are men of military age. Worth considering, also noteworthy many were Muslim. Mohammed was a warrior and the Muslims cleared Egypt of Coptic Christians and Christians have been killed or left the Middle East. Something to think about. As far as South American men, I cannot say, except refugee numbers are surging when our children cannot afford and our streets and shelters are full.
ya..exact same happening all over the planet..and especially the Commonwealth nations..Australia/New Zealand..Canada..UK..Ireland..etc..not much in the WEF Liberal media (mostly cuz CBC/ CTV/ Global are owned by those same Liberals), so the only way we REAL Canadians can get the full story is here on Juno/ True North News/ Rebel news/ Aristotle/ Epoch/etc..sources the Liberals are trying to abolish..Carney/ Trudeau/ Singh/ Freeland and others ban them all from media gatherings/ campaign speeches/ Carney himself had True North illegally removed from his scrum announcing his Party Leadership!! The Libs are up to something HUGE..WEF/ UN Agenda 21 HUGE..
Glad to see Conservatives doing better in Ontario. Doug Ford is a disgrace, but he got re-elected cause the voters can be herded. Poillievre is more compelling, but I wish his chief of staff was not so dumb as the wear Maga hat.
This is the best news in weeks. I don't see what anyone sees in Mark Carnage. He is a snake oil salesman, a grifter, and his policies, like Trudeau's will destroy our country and that is exactly what he wants so the globalists can take over. He has spent the last few years working for the United Nations who have admitted that their goal is World Governance. Carney is also a WEF executive and has working for both globalist entities for Net Zero 50. This election isn't about Trump, because these tariffs aren't going to last long. When Americans see their cost of living spiral upward this will be over. This election is about our country thriving as it used to, before Truedope became PM, where his policies left the country with 40% more crime caused by his catch and release policy, he politicized our judicial system, people living and sleeping on our streets, drugs out of control, immigration policies that caused a housing shortage, a health crisis, an infrastructure crisis, housing cost and rent out of control and other social policies like LGBTQ, gender, critical race theory, DEI, ESG, and NET ZERO, all policies designed by the UN and WEF to destroy countries. Further Trudeau has a paid mouth piece, mainstream media who he pays to support his policies. Now Carney will give the CBC, 150 million added to the 1.3billion that they already get from the government, to sensor misinformation and disinformation ... sound familiar. These are policies of banana republic, or communist China, not Canada.
I agree with everything you wrote, well done. Who voted for the UN or WEF, not me. For me, I am concerned about climate change and I believe it is possible for humans to dump too many nitous oxide, HCFC’s and C02 into the atmosphere, resulting in a heat trap. .Atmospheres matter, no atmosphere, we are dead, a thin atmosphere we freeze. If we do not agree to reach net zero, then perhaps we can agree that we need more flood controls, more high wind building controls and fire protection, Jasper, Abbotsford and Fort McMurray are real. Carney is looking so bad.
Hi Peter; Thanks for you comment. Peter I have been casually researching Climate change for about 14 years. What you are hearing on mainstream media is anything but the truth. This reason I say this is that in the 600 million year , history of the planet CO2 has never caused warming ... ever. Simply, this is a hoax that was started in the 1960's by the Club of Rome who were a bunch of wealthy people who thought humans will ruin the world. The UN took this over under Maurice Strong, in the early 70's as strong was the first director of the UNEP which spawned the UNIPCC. The UNIPCC has admitted that this isn't about the environment rather than changing the world economic system which has been in use for the past 150 years. Christiana Fugueres the former Exec. Sec. of the UNFCCC, stated this a few years ago. She was talking about Capitalism which they don't like, nor freedom, nor democracy. They have used the hoax of CO2 emission that somehow they think that this will make the earth burn up. This will never happen because every greenhouse gas Water vapour H20, ( the most abundant GHG) CO2, CH4, N2O and O3 are all saturated in the atmosphere; there have been several studies on this and all agree. CO2 is so saturated that Jim Mason, a scientist who analyzed Will Happer and William Wijngaarden' recent study puts it this way: CO2 is IMPOTANT as a greenhouse gas.
In fact CO2 has been saturated from what we know about the beginning of time.
Molecule wise, Mason says that CO2 is attenuated by 4 orders of magnitude. In the past it has been 7000 ppm and a minimum of 180 ppm during the last Glacial Maximum. ( plants start to die off at 150ppm.) The most recent increases in emission over the last century have greened the earth in every country and this is the shin gin light concerning CO2 emissions. CH4 and NO3 also saturated cannot do any discernible harm for the future. Saturation is one of the reason why the Computer models are so drastically exaggerated and are so out of sync with measured Satellite and Balloon measured temperature data. Go look on "climate change dispatch" as there is scientific info about mostly CO2 and CH4. Plants at 280 ppm before emission started are idling. Will Happer states that we need about 1000 ppm but we will never get there as there isn't enough Carbon to burn. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3Tfxiuo-oM
As temperature rises, water vapour increases, H20 is a green house gas.
HCFCs and Nitogen oxidesare also GHGs
Deserts are expanding
Storm severitynincreasing
Insurance payouts increasing due to floss fire winds
The person who wrote your referenced movie is a economist with a bone to grind, since he also wrote about being pro Brexit, and illegal immigration never went down.
Conservatives do not have to be anti ecology, conserve is the root of conservative. Reforms pPrestin Manning chastised the CPC for having no policy on ecology.
I do not think we will get to net zero, likely weather will get more erratic and so what is the plan to mitigate climate damage?
The CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is 425 not 480 ... get you facts straight. First of all, even the IPCC states clearly that there is no signal that the slight warming of the 20th century has cause extreme weather events.
If you look in history southern US centuries ago had a drought for 100 years... we have had seen nothing like this; look at the 1930's there wasn't enough change in CO2 to do any warming from 1910 to 1940. Not only that after WW2 there was significant increase in CO2 from 1950 onwards but what happened, there was a sudden cooling from 1950 to 1975 which some scientists predicted that we were entering another Ice Age.. Time magazine put this on it from page in the 70's ... I remember this. I 'll say this once again the reason that the computer models are wrong is that they suggest that CO2 is causing warming which then intern would increase water vapour which would warm the earth. However this isn't happening. There are two reasons 1. water vapour is saturated therefore its effect as a green house gas in mostly eliminated 2. Even if it wasn't, which is is, more clouds would form to cool the planet. The scientists featured in the movie Climate: the Movie are the most revered scientists in the world. Further I could care less about what Preston Manning says he is as ignorant as anyone concerning greenhouse gasses. You don't need any plan to mitigate warming or cooling which can happen in what you called climate change. The reason that the catch phrase "global warming" was changed to "climate change" was this; from about 1978 to 1998 we had a warming period; some scientists particularly from the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit and the partners in crime in the Climategate fraud, those from Penn State University were thinking that this warming would never quit because they believed that the warming would follow the increase in CO2 but what happened? After a large El NINo in 1998 the temperature levelled off for about 17 years. It took the IPCC nearly 5 years in 2003 to come up with a reason why the warming stopped. Instead of trying to find out, they simply didn't know so the IPCC simply moved the goal posts and said that since the warming stopped we should call this climate change. However everyone still refers this as global warming. Willie Soon and 40 additional scientists did a massive study on the USA warming of the 20th century and they found that about half the warming was due to Urban Heat Island Effect which is a situation where weather stations once properly installed in fields out side of towns are now in the middle of cities producing false temperature readings caused by heat radiation from concrete, pavement, brick buildings and exhaust from air conditioning. The other half of the warming was caused by Solar variation and you should have seen his presentation in the Climate movie which shows the sun's variation correlating exactly with the warm two periods from 1910 -1940 and 1978 t o 1998 and the cooling period from 1950 to 1975. Show me another scientific study that opposes this. End of story.
Pierre had a rally in Penticton a large warhouse , not near big enough as there were people leaving that could not get in and at least 500 people standing out side and Carney can't fill a pub so who is lying the polls or the real things we see
Mark Carney has been here before—in the midst of an economic crisis, leaning heavily on fear instead of hope. Once again, he has chosen a message of despair, rooted not in policy or principle, but in guile and political ambition.
During the Leaders’ Debate, Carney had an opportunity to present himself as a leader with vision. It was a chance to uplift Canadians, offer solutions, and unite the country with a common purpose based on hope and resilience.
Instead, he chose fear mongering.
Stating:
“We are facing the biggest crisis of our lifetimes,” Carney said. “Donald Trump is trying to fundamentally change the world economy, the trading system, but really what he is trying to do to Canada, he is trying to break us, so the U.S. can own us. They want our land, they want our resources, they want our water. They want our country.”
This is fear-based politics at its worst—building a platform not on a vision for Canada, but on Trump’s rhetoric and hypotheticals. He ignored the real conversation Canadians deserve: the destruction of the Liberal Party’s credibility and governance. Where is the accountability? Where is the plan for a different outcome?
Are we simply trading Daddy Trudeau for Mommy Carney?
Canadians deserve better. I will choose hope over fear—every time.
We'll take it!!..and start REALLY putting the pressure on!! There are some stubborn "Liberals" that REFUSE to see that their party is nothing but a front for the WEF/ UN agenda 21 Regime, but SOME are starting to put things together..and when we inform them of Justin's 2015 chat with the NY Times "Canada is the first post national state" that seemed to snap them awake!! I know it doesn't sound like much..but if it gets the ball rolling, it'll gain momentum (hmm..think that's why The WEF Front called the election for the earliest possible date??..Pretty sure they underestimated Poilievre's rallies and the massive turnouts that are turning the tide..LET'S KEEP IT UP..
Carneys problems go beyond WEF rhetoric. His platform is premisednon hope not rational action. First he smells corrupt. Second how will he balance budget, cutting taxes and spending massive on infrastructure. Third, his housing plan will not deliver affordable for purchase homes. And not likely to build rentals/subsidised homes at 500,000 a year. Fourth, he lies, like Justin in 2015. Do you now know why Justin lied about ending first past the post, cause in the two elections the CPC got more popular votes than LOC. Our democracy has warts.
The conservatives, in my opinion, should be somewhere around 75%+. As it is quite obvious that con carney and the lieberals plan is to completely distroy this country. As we've been witnessing for the last decade. More evidence is in con carney getting loans from china not canada, to the tune of a quarter billion dollars. Then, moving all his money to burmuda. And moving his company to the US. Why would a person who believes in the country that he wants to rule in do this. Only some one who has dirty ultimate plans would do such a thing. To me that's a traitor. AND this doesn't take in that they have been pilfering from the taxpayers piggy bank.
So true!!..and he probably used Canada as collateral for his Chinese loan!!..bastard!! It's beyond my comprehension how the WEF Liberals have supporters..must be all the "Temp" foreign workers/ Illegal / unchecked immigrants (the bad ones), and their CCP buddies...Well the only way to beat them is to have at least 80% voter turnout for the Conservatives Apr 28..and we're gonna cast the early vote cuz hopefully election night will be swamped
You got something there. We have that and all the 100s of thousand bureaucrates and their families to go against. It's and uphill push all the way.
The three scandals this article mentions are just the tip of the iceberg, and if one digs deeper, they would find that Con Carney should be classed as a traitor, with the new name, Convicted Traitor Carney!
I'm wanting to confirm something on Facebook today..2 guys on their cell talking about hundreds of South Americans (almost all male ) arriving at Pearson today and being shuttled thru to waiting busses..not trying to stir things up but did anyone else see anything at Pearson??
To add to your concerns, I feel mass immigration is ruining our country. Yesterday, a female podcaster from Israel noted that the majority of refugees that came to Europe are men of military age. Worth considering, also noteworthy many were Muslim. Mohammed was a warrior and the Muslims cleared Egypt of Coptic Christians and Christians have been killed or left the Middle East. Something to think about. As far as South American men, I cannot say, except refugee numbers are surging when our children cannot afford and our streets and shelters are full.
ya..exact same happening all over the planet..and especially the Commonwealth nations..Australia/New Zealand..Canada..UK..Ireland..etc..not much in the WEF Liberal media (mostly cuz CBC/ CTV/ Global are owned by those same Liberals), so the only way we REAL Canadians can get the full story is here on Juno/ True North News/ Rebel news/ Aristotle/ Epoch/etc..sources the Liberals are trying to abolish..Carney/ Trudeau/ Singh/ Freeland and others ban them all from media gatherings/ campaign speeches/ Carney himself had True North illegally removed from his scrum announcing his Party Leadership!! The Libs are up to something HUGE..WEF/ UN Agenda 21 HUGE..
Glad to see Conservatives doing better in Ontario. Doug Ford is a disgrace, but he got re-elected cause the voters can be herded. Poillievre is more compelling, but I wish his chief of staff was not so dumb as the wear Maga hat.
This is the best news in weeks. I don't see what anyone sees in Mark Carnage. He is a snake oil salesman, a grifter, and his policies, like Trudeau's will destroy our country and that is exactly what he wants so the globalists can take over. He has spent the last few years working for the United Nations who have admitted that their goal is World Governance. Carney is also a WEF executive and has working for both globalist entities for Net Zero 50. This election isn't about Trump, because these tariffs aren't going to last long. When Americans see their cost of living spiral upward this will be over. This election is about our country thriving as it used to, before Truedope became PM, where his policies left the country with 40% more crime caused by his catch and release policy, he politicized our judicial system, people living and sleeping on our streets, drugs out of control, immigration policies that caused a housing shortage, a health crisis, an infrastructure crisis, housing cost and rent out of control and other social policies like LGBTQ, gender, critical race theory, DEI, ESG, and NET ZERO, all policies designed by the UN and WEF to destroy countries. Further Trudeau has a paid mouth piece, mainstream media who he pays to support his policies. Now Carney will give the CBC, 150 million added to the 1.3billion that they already get from the government, to sensor misinformation and disinformation ... sound familiar. These are policies of banana republic, or communist China, not Canada.
I agree with everything you wrote, well done. Who voted for the UN or WEF, not me. For me, I am concerned about climate change and I believe it is possible for humans to dump too many nitous oxide, HCFC’s and C02 into the atmosphere, resulting in a heat trap. .Atmospheres matter, no atmosphere, we are dead, a thin atmosphere we freeze. If we do not agree to reach net zero, then perhaps we can agree that we need more flood controls, more high wind building controls and fire protection, Jasper, Abbotsford and Fort McMurray are real. Carney is looking so bad.
Hi Peter; Thanks for you comment. Peter I have been casually researching Climate change for about 14 years. What you are hearing on mainstream media is anything but the truth. This reason I say this is that in the 600 million year , history of the planet CO2 has never caused warming ... ever. Simply, this is a hoax that was started in the 1960's by the Club of Rome who were a bunch of wealthy people who thought humans will ruin the world. The UN took this over under Maurice Strong, in the early 70's as strong was the first director of the UNEP which spawned the UNIPCC. The UNIPCC has admitted that this isn't about the environment rather than changing the world economic system which has been in use for the past 150 years. Christiana Fugueres the former Exec. Sec. of the UNFCCC, stated this a few years ago. She was talking about Capitalism which they don't like, nor freedom, nor democracy. They have used the hoax of CO2 emission that somehow they think that this will make the earth burn up. This will never happen because every greenhouse gas Water vapour H20, ( the most abundant GHG) CO2, CH4, N2O and O3 are all saturated in the atmosphere; there have been several studies on this and all agree. CO2 is so saturated that Jim Mason, a scientist who analyzed Will Happer and William Wijngaarden' recent study puts it this way: CO2 is IMPOTANT as a greenhouse gas.
In fact CO2 has been saturated from what we know about the beginning of time.
Molecule wise, Mason says that CO2 is attenuated by 4 orders of magnitude. In the past it has been 7000 ppm and a minimum of 180 ppm during the last Glacial Maximum. ( plants start to die off at 150ppm.) The most recent increases in emission over the last century have greened the earth in every country and this is the shin gin light concerning CO2 emissions. CH4 and NO3 also saturated cannot do any discernible harm for the future. Saturation is one of the reason why the Computer models are so drastically exaggerated and are so out of sync with measured Satellite and Balloon measured temperature data. Go look on "climate change dispatch" as there is scientific info about mostly CO2 and CH4. Plants at 280 ppm before emission started are idling. Will Happer states that we need about 1000 ppm but we will never get there as there isn't enough Carbon to burn. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3Tfxiuo-oM
C02 is 480ppm now, not saturated, record level
As temperature rises, water vapour increases, H20 is a green house gas.
HCFCs and Nitogen oxidesare also GHGs
Deserts are expanding
Storm severitynincreasing
Insurance payouts increasing due to floss fire winds
The person who wrote your referenced movie is a economist with a bone to grind, since he also wrote about being pro Brexit, and illegal immigration never went down.
Conservatives do not have to be anti ecology, conserve is the root of conservative. Reforms pPrestin Manning chastised the CPC for having no policy on ecology.
I do not think we will get to net zero, likely weather will get more erratic and so what is the plan to mitigate climate damage?
The CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is 425 not 480 ... get you facts straight. First of all, even the IPCC states clearly that there is no signal that the slight warming of the 20th century has cause extreme weather events.
If you look in history southern US centuries ago had a drought for 100 years... we have had seen nothing like this; look at the 1930's there wasn't enough change in CO2 to do any warming from 1910 to 1940. Not only that after WW2 there was significant increase in CO2 from 1950 onwards but what happened, there was a sudden cooling from 1950 to 1975 which some scientists predicted that we were entering another Ice Age.. Time magazine put this on it from page in the 70's ... I remember this. I 'll say this once again the reason that the computer models are wrong is that they suggest that CO2 is causing warming which then intern would increase water vapour which would warm the earth. However this isn't happening. There are two reasons 1. water vapour is saturated therefore its effect as a green house gas in mostly eliminated 2. Even if it wasn't, which is is, more clouds would form to cool the planet. The scientists featured in the movie Climate: the Movie are the most revered scientists in the world. Further I could care less about what Preston Manning says he is as ignorant as anyone concerning greenhouse gasses. You don't need any plan to mitigate warming or cooling which can happen in what you called climate change. The reason that the catch phrase "global warming" was changed to "climate change" was this; from about 1978 to 1998 we had a warming period; some scientists particularly from the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit and the partners in crime in the Climategate fraud, those from Penn State University were thinking that this warming would never quit because they believed that the warming would follow the increase in CO2 but what happened? After a large El NINo in 1998 the temperature levelled off for about 17 years. It took the IPCC nearly 5 years in 2003 to come up with a reason why the warming stopped. Instead of trying to find out, they simply didn't know so the IPCC simply moved the goal posts and said that since the warming stopped we should call this climate change. However everyone still refers this as global warming. Willie Soon and 40 additional scientists did a massive study on the USA warming of the 20th century and they found that about half the warming was due to Urban Heat Island Effect which is a situation where weather stations once properly installed in fields out side of towns are now in the middle of cities producing false temperature readings caused by heat radiation from concrete, pavement, brick buildings and exhaust from air conditioning. The other half of the warming was caused by Solar variation and you should have seen his presentation in the Climate movie which shows the sun's variation correlating exactly with the warm two periods from 1910 -1940 and 1978 t o 1998 and the cooling period from 1950 to 1975. Show me another scientific study that opposes this. End of story.
Pierre had a rally in Penticton a large warhouse , not near big enough as there were people leaving that could not get in and at least 500 people standing out side and Carney can't fill a pub so who is lying the polls or the real things we see
Carney Brings Project Fear to Canada
Mark Carney has been here before—in the midst of an economic crisis, leaning heavily on fear instead of hope. Once again, he has chosen a message of despair, rooted not in policy or principle, but in guile and political ambition.
During the Leaders’ Debate, Carney had an opportunity to present himself as a leader with vision. It was a chance to uplift Canadians, offer solutions, and unite the country with a common purpose based on hope and resilience.
Instead, he chose fear mongering.
Stating:
“We are facing the biggest crisis of our lifetimes,” Carney said. “Donald Trump is trying to fundamentally change the world economy, the trading system, but really what he is trying to do to Canada, he is trying to break us, so the U.S. can own us. They want our land, they want our resources, they want our water. They want our country.”
This is fear-based politics at its worst—building a platform not on a vision for Canada, but on Trump’s rhetoric and hypotheticals. He ignored the real conversation Canadians deserve: the destruction of the Liberal Party’s credibility and governance. Where is the accountability? Where is the plan for a different outcome?
Are we simply trading Daddy Trudeau for Mommy Carney?
Canadians deserve better. I will choose hope over fear—every time.