17 Comments
User's avatar
Don's avatar

β€œThe masses never revolt of their own accord, and they never revolt merely because they are oppressed. Indeed, so long as they are not permitted to have standards of comparison, they never even become aware that they are oppressed.”’

Orwell...(probably)

Expand full comment
Tatanka's avatar

The masses are so occupied with their little mundane lives they have no clue to what is happening out there in the real world. All they care about is the latest fashion and the celebrities scandals and some sports

Expand full comment
Don's avatar

"the people will not revolt. They will not look up from their screens"

Orwell..(sorta)

Expand full comment
Lisa Bildy's avatar

Find us here: www.fsucanada.ca

Expand full comment
Melanie Bennet, True North.'s avatar

^worth it.

Expand full comment
RenΓ©e & Garry White's avatar

Thanks for alerting us to FSU Canada - we just joined. SO important.

Expand full comment
Melanie Bennet, True North.'s avatar

I'm so pleased up hear that. Strength in numbers!

Expand full comment
Janet Hale's avatar

That was very well articulated, thank-you both.

Expand full comment
Anthony Frizzell's avatar

These people of oppression should be charged with treason..!!!

Expand full comment
Janet Buhler's avatar

When truth is labeled as hate speech, then there is no free speech! Was there not an article last week that says university students are not expressing their real views for fear of reprisals? If that is the case, and I believe it is, then was have no free speech.

Expand full comment
peter galeazzi's avatar

yes that was the topic of a headline i seen on sevral websites

Expand full comment
glenn estell's avatar

(generaization) if it doesn't affect my beer at 5pm--i don't care

Expand full comment
mike's avatar

It won’t affect your beer till u have one to many and say something that’s going to offend someone. Then u will have a problem.

Expand full comment
darlene duerks's avatar

it will

Expand full comment
Jessie James's avatar

What Canada REALLY needs are Governments who are first and foremost COMPETENT and SECOND, who care more about it's own Citizens that it does about Immigrants, (Legal or Illegal) and Fake Asylum Seekers! Until this happens, Canada is DOOMED!

Expand full comment
Melanie Bennet, True North.'s avatar

And until that magically happens, I highly recommend citizens take part in the fight. The Free Speech Union is a great choice to atart.

Expand full comment
Richard Calland's avatar

Thought this perspective re gun control merits consideration / discussion in Canada. When does the political Left say TAKE AWAY THE GUNS?

Jon Rappoport

Sep 26, 2025

βˆ™ Paid

Some of the lawmakers are saying it now, of course, in the wake of the Charlie Kirk assassination.

But what about after any weekend in Chicago?

Those murders don’t count?

Let’s try to figure this out.

On the one hand, the Left claims people are going way overboard calling the Kirk killing a tragedy, because…THEIR PEOPLE IN THE UNDERCLASS-LEFT get killed all the time and nobody makes a big deal out of it.

But on the other hand, when THEIR PEOPLE DO get routinely shot and killed in big cities, do they shout that guns have to be taken away from the shooters?

Do they shout TAKE THE GUNS AWAY FROM THE GANGS?

I’ve never heard that come out of their mouths.

Even though gangs shoot and kill more people than any other group.

What’s the explanation?

There’s only one.

GANGS are also THEIR PEOPLE.

Yup.

So GANGS have to be let off the hook.

Just take the guns from good old boys in the hills of Tennessee.

But don’t you dare disarm GANGS in big cities.

GANGS are a special group. They only shoot people because…socioeconomic conditions.

So they’re not really committing crimes, even though people struck by their bullets are lying dead in the streets.

That’s not a gun crime. That’s β€œcompensatory behavior which reasonably springs from generations of deprivation…”

Therefore, GANGS must keep their guns.

Otherwise, how can they express and vent their wholly understandable frustrations?

In fact, GANGS have automatic weapons. But they need big weapons to express big frustrations.

It all makes sense when you figure it out.

If you say GANGS ARE STONE COLD KILLERS AND THAT’S THE BEGINNING AND END OF THE STORY, you’re a racist.

The charge of racism is just a way the Left protects its own peopleβ€”THE GANGS. Playing the race card is a sign of admirable loyalty. Right.

There’s a further Leftist cultural complication we have to unravel here:

See, in the case of the Charley Kirk assassination, it was actually OK that the shooter had a gun. Because as far as the truly PRINCIPLED radical Leftists are concerned, the death of Charlie Kirk was a righteous act.

The guns have to be taken away AFTER Kirk’s murder.

Uh-huh.

But bottom line in the Leftist manual: never say THE GUNS HAVE TO BE TAKEN AWAY FROM THE GANGS.

Now we understand. Now we understand the gun issue.

Now we can move forward in the destruction of America.

-- Jon Rappoport

Further reading for yearly subscribers: β€œAmerica, a country without education; this is what it looks like” (here)

If you’re a monthly subscriber, click here to learn about the additional benefits received when upgrading to yearly. If you’re a yearly subscriber, access has already been granted to you, here.

72 Likes

βˆ™

9 Restacks

Expand full comment