7 Comments
User's avatar
Doug Stephens's avatar

Its incredible that after 4 years this debate on bodies is still going on. It's very straight forward to end this nonsense- release the report that the GPR technician created, and start the forensic explorations.

Good for this MLA for refusing to back down.

Expand full comment
Joe Zucchiatti's avatar

The Indian business has been adept at squeezing the coffers of our syncopant governments for generations. This is just one small example of the guilt complex that they perpetrate. There is no documentation of any back hoes purchased or even one shouval purchased for digging upthe Kamloops school yard. I assume the monies have been spent on meetings and planning by the many chiefs and the whole project of exhumation is failing due to “ underfunding”. This is the “systemic racism” that is the Indian Act. There will never be reconciliation for the hundreds of billions of dollars that have been spent since confederation strictly on a racial basis. It is time for one Canada, one people with equal rights.

Expand full comment
Gary's avatar

Ms Brodie maintain your stand, the truth is on your side. The truth is becoming a rare commodity in this country, especially from the Federal Government. Some of our aboriginals are milking this issue to the nth degree for monetary gain and by doing so, destroying any credibility they may have on any issue.

Expand full comment
Eva Smillie's avatar

I applaud this brave gal for not being afraid to speak the truth. Not 1 corpse, people, yet millions of tax dollars were given to the Indigenous community for a hoax!?? Trudeau laying flowers on a bunch of rocks was outrageous! Every, single, politician, should be made to read "Grave Error", & become reconciled to the actual truth.

Expand full comment
Dan Ball's avatar

Hold the Line Ms. Brodie there are Canadians out there that stand with you I being one.

Expand full comment
Barry Dixon's avatar

Yet another example of Indian extortion.

We have to stop it. They never will.

Expand full comment
Kim metke's avatar

Is it not true that even this is incorrect.

That a portion of the area of the grave site was actually dug up in a prior archeological dig and that the original report was modified by the author to state the there were only 200 “potential” grave sites.

Leading one to further conclude that the probability of graves being discovered at this site is even more remote.

Expand full comment